Richard Seltzer's
home page Publishing home
Articles
about DEC
mgmt memo
Volume 3, Number 1_____________________________________________________
February 1984
At the February 1 State of
the Company Meeting, the focus was on the customer and
Digital's product strengths. Over 400 senior managers
attended the meeting, at which Ken Olsen talked about the
product line structure, decision making and good management
practices. He emphasized the need to make Digital the lowest
cost manufacturer in the industry. Jack Shields moderated
the morning, which focused on putting the customer first,
and Jack Smith moderated the afternoon, which emphasized the
strengths of current and near-future products.
Ken Olsen Talks
About Management At Digital
Quality
Programs And Putting The Customer First
Jack
Shields; Customer Loyalty Is Our Number One Asset
Jerry
Paxton: Account Management And Customer Satisfaction
Chick Shue; The
Field Team Goal
Mike
Kalagher: Order Administration Issues
Dave
Grainger: Standard Systems
VAX Strategy:
VMS and UNIX -- Bill Heffner, Manager, Systems Software
Personal
Computers: Friend Or Foe?
Barry James Folsom, Manager, Rainbow Business Group
Other News
IVIS
Applications And Customers
We are in a changing world.
In the next year or two, there will be major technological
breakthroughs in our industry like putting a VAX on a chip.
We have great reason to be proud of the role we have already
played in areas like taking the technology of large,
expensive, half-million-dollar computers and making
computers that sell for less than a car. The changes yet to
come are tremendous.
Change is coming not just
because of technology, but also because the competition
demands it. IBM is zeroing in on us. They are setting about
to be the lowest cost manufacturer in the world. Our goal
and theirs is to go into the most exciting, most fun and
most promising markets. I want them to chase us and'not have
us chase them. And this is going to make the next few years
fun and exciting. To accomplish this, Digital is going to be
very alert, very organized and very effective.
We started product lines a
long time ago because the company had gotten too big for one
person to manage. So, we broke the company into pieces, each
one with a model that included the cost to engineer, build,
market and sell the product. The measure of success was the
product line's profit margin. This model brought us
magnificent results. The first year we doubled our profit
without hiring anyone. All of this came about because
someone was held responsible for a given part of the
company. We made it effective by saying, 'You’ve got the
model. We're going to measure you every month on what profit
you make.'
Well, things got a little
complicated. Product lines began to feel like the more
credit they received for orders, the more power they had,
and layers of management began to build. We finally had to
sit back and ask ourselves if all the money we were putting
into measurements and layers was valuable to the customer.
So, we decided to make some changes.
The product lines are still
the source of strategy. They're still the group that looks
to the future and the group that maintains contact with
customers because customers sometimes need someone at
headquarters to talk with.
But, when we took away some
of the measurements this last year, we lost some of the
positive features of the product lines. One of our goals
this year is to get the product lines back to being
responsible for defining and managing a model and a strategy
for their market area.
Things are coming back now.
The feeling of influence is reappearing in the product
lines. This is important, because they are key to the
company's success.
The experiences in defining
product line roles make me think about the importance of
good decision making. This process requires that people
worry about how much money they have, how it's spent, and
what their strategy is. There are two categories of
difficult decisions. One deals with questions that have
answers that don't really make a difference. That's why they
are hard. In that case, somebody, probably the boss, just
ought to flip a coin or go one way or the other. Then there
are the hard decisions. My theory is that hard decisions
require a lot of work. You have to struggle with them, and
you have to talk to a lot of people.
There are a lot of hard
questions we have to answer. If you go and ask any of our
engineers one of these hard questions, you get a different
answer from each of them. The answer is always clear when
you meet with just one person, but you won't get all the
information you need to make the right decision.
All I'm saying is that
decisions are hard. We don't need arbitrary management.
It's hard. When people ask why we have three personal
computers, I tell them it's because we were smart enough to
know we didn't know. So, we tried all three. And
interestingly, the one that's doing the best was third on
the list of which ones we thought would win.
So, we change. People who get
carried away with their own propaganda, who think they
understand the whole thing, will invariably fail. You must
experiment and change in order to progress. Final solutions
simply aren't the way of science or the way of progress.
Difficult decisons take time. It's hard, and you have to
change, and you have to be humble enough to admit that you
don't know it all.
When we have goals—and they
are an integral part of our success--they are proposed by
the people doing the work. Goals have to be specific. If
everything is budgeted and reviewed, we’ll know where we're
going and how to get there.
I want our managers to learn
the job of management. They must first of all take care of
the problems at hand and keep morale high. There is no such
thing as, 'I don't have time for this or that.' If you're a
manager, you8re a sergeant, a lieutenant or
captain. Your job is to take care of your people. It doesn't
necessarily mean that you have responsibility for the
strategy. Your job is to manage to a set of agreed upon
goals. You have to budget, control the finances, control the
people and take care of the people. If they need help, if
they need consoling or inspiring, it's your job.
You should worry about
management all of the time. You should read and study and
learn. And, you must practice your management skills, just
like you'd practice the piano or some other musical
instrument.
You have heard today that we
have enormous potential to grow. We have equipment coming
that will enable us to do great things. We have to think
about how much money we can raise, how much growth that will
allow and where we want to budget for development. We have
to pick how fast we can go and still remain in control. Then
we have to make a list of all the product lines we are in
and figure out the long-term stability, the return we can
get for our products and the fun and contributions we can
make to society and industry with our equipment.
A good question we have to
consider is, 'How do we decide what products we're going to
engineer and what markets we're going into?' First of all,
we need to know what we can financially support. In
business, this parameter straightens everything out. In
some cases, we will tie Engineering directly to Marketing
because they interconnect so nicely. We'll look at the
return, the value, we'll allocate the Engineering funds,
work up a consistent strategy and bring it to the Board and
say, 'Here is where we propose you allocate money in
Engineering.' If we do it right, they'll approve our
proposal. So that's how we allocate resources in the
company. This means that some projects won't be supported.
They can't all be supported .
As we set about to grow,
remember one thing. IBM has publicly announced that they're
going to be the lowest cost manufacturer. As we grow, there
might be a temptation to be a little lazy about cost
structures and financial models. But, we have to be lower
cost than IBM, less expensive. Remember one more thing about
Digital and about today. Be proud of what you heard
today...we're doing magnificent things as a company.
Most of the problems we
experienced in Q1 were transitory. But, the most important,
and potentially the most risky issue relates to the
long-term viability of our relationships with our customers.
When we talk about the assets
of the company, we all have our favorite areas to point to.
Some say our people, obviously an asset. Others say our
product, our engineering, our manufacturing, our sales, our
services, our financial stability, etc. But, really the most
important asset that this company has is its customer
loyalty.
If we stay with those
customers and if we strive to do a good job with those
customers, they will be loyal and the success of the company
is almost assured. So we've been looking at issues related
to quality and customer satisfaction in the Field and
Manufacturing.
Quality is a pervasive
issue. It begins with the first time you contact your
customer, and it never ends because you want that customer
to continually buy from you. Everybody in the company plays
a role in quality and customer satisfaction. Today we will
talk about the aspect that has to do with customer contact: how we treat
the customer, our responsiveness, our
ability to make commitments
and to follow through on them. Supporting this contact level
is a layer of interdependencies that go back to our
engineering schedules and the way that we plan and order
material and build inventory.
In Q2, stimulated by some of
the things that happened in Ql, senior people in the Field
and Manufacturing began to meet every Tuesday. We look at
order rates to see if we can get the end-of-the-quar ter
skew out of the orders. We focus on what the customer sees
of the order cycle once the order has been secured. We look
at shipments by week compared to our quarterly goal for
shipments. We look at material availability vs. customer
expectations.
I think the results from Q2
speak for themselves. One thing that we learned from last
quarter is that we've got a fantastic organization in this
company. And if we get together around a set of common
goals, in spite of all the environmental pressures, we
succeed. Respect builds and teamwork builds. This is
exemplified in the relationship which has developed between
Manufacturing and the Field.
I want to thank everyone in
the company—particularly people in Manufacturing and the
Field—for their outstanding contributions in Q2. With
continued support, the upcoming quarters will be excellent.
I go into the last half of this year with tremendous
enthusiasm for our organization and for the things we can do
when we set our mind to it.
Everyone at Digital has a
role in customer satisfaction. Account management is the
series of programs that allows digital to line up more
closely with the way our customers are organized. One of its
primary objectives is to make our geographic or market
organizations transparent to the customer so we are easy to
do business with.
We run annual surveys to
measure the field on customer satisfaction. Geographic as
well as account teams are measured by the surveys, which
give us a basis for better communications with the customer.
Our highest scores
have almost always been on the attitude and manner of our
people in all the Field functions. The low scores have been
in lead time, delivery, and generally the other
doing-business areas.
We focus on making life
easier for customers while at the same time learning about
their future and current computing needs. For example, we
have a planning partnership program. As I speak, there is a
three-day meeting going on in Wilmington, Delaware with
DuPont. It is primarily a joint planning activity between
their senior managers and many of our senior Field and
Marketing people.
Such meetings help us
understand customer needs and help customers understand
what our products and technology will be in the near future
so they can make two-to-five year plans. As we bring our
products to market, we work with our larger accounts—to get
a feel for product applicability, reliabil-
ity, and applications. These
meetings are an interactive and very constructive way to
cement customer relationships.
The Customer Assistance
Network is another program in Account Management designed to
help solve the customer's problem. At the local as well as
the corporate levels, we collect data, determine what we can
learn from it, and work with the people involved in customer
assistance in the Field.
Our Field team goal is to
treat our customers, large and small, better than any other
computer company in the world. Customer satisfaction is good
business. It will increase customer loyalty, and help take
sales from our competitors.
Our first priority is to
communicate this goal to all of our employees. Training is
also important. We plan to sit with each of our employees to
make sure they understand their role in this customer
satisfaction mission. From telephone etiquette, to handling
complaints, to managing critical customer problems; our
employees must perform well in all of these areas.
Contacting a Digital office
must be a predictable, professional and pleasant experience.
Call handling, timeliness, and follow up—all are important.
A task force has been assigned to develop a closed-loop
tracking system so that every customer receives the service
needed to meet his or her request. Already in the New
England District, a customer only has to call one contact,
the Customer Care Center, which provides service across all
functions until the customer is satisfied.
Measurement and recognition
programs will reinforce the importance of putting the
customer first. The district manager's salary review will be
linked to customer satisfaction through the survey results,
as will the FY84 district team award. Finally, we must
recognize and thank the majority of our employees who
already treat our customers with sincere and professional
courtesy on a daily basis. Their attitude, combined with
focus and programs, will surely enable the field to achieve
its customer satisfaction goal.
In managing orders, customer
satisfaction means giving commitments that are quick and
predictable and delivering against those commitments. The
goal is a steady flow of orders.
We are pushing to reduce
receipt-to-order and acknowledgement times.
Receipt-to-certification measures the time we receive an
order until it is verified and flowing through the systems.
Today, 50% of our orders are indeed cleaned up, entered, and
certified within our one-day goal. The other 50% are the
problems we are concentrating on. Many of the reasons are
credit problems, insufficient data, peak work loading on the
work force. The more we do to smooth out the incoming flow
of orders, the better off we’re going to be at achieving the
goal. We want to view order responsiveness from the
customer’s perspective, which means the day he or she gives
the order becomes our receipt date. Order acknowledgement
time (i.e., the commitment schedule date) is the next thing
the customer sees and, therefore, the primary measure of the
order cycle time. We continue to work with Manufacturing and
other supply points to eliminate any delays in the cycle.
Our DEC Standard Price List
posed a length and bulk problem that has also been resolved
to a large extent. As of Q2, the list had grown to 47,000
line items on 500 pages. In Q2 we took significant steps to
simplify that book by examining product demand. We now have
a much-reduced price list of under 10,000 items, and expect
further reductions.
Today an order that arrives
in a branch front-end system and becomes a certification is
transmitted overnight to a backlog system, and then, with no
edits, is made immediately available to Manufacturing to
schedule. Manufacturing in turn has done an excellent job of
getting the individual orders visible to the plant as fast
as possible so that any materials issues can be resolved.
We have also begun
implementing a new standard delivery program called "DEC 24"
where, for selected products, an order and a shipment happen
within 24 hours of a simple phone call.
The Standard Systems Program
is a way to simplify the way our salespeople sell and the
way our customers order products. It addresses configuration
issues and deals with logistics and order administration
activities. Q4 is targeted as the start-up quarter for the
program, which will be formally launched in FY85. Although
parts of the program have been piloted, the next few months
are considered a development period.
A Standard System is a
preconfigured, fully operational system, including an
operating system, that can be ordered through a single part
number. The plan is to build standard systems in volume and
distribute them from special warehouse locations in
anticipation of customer orders. Normally, Manufacturing
builds systems to customer order. Under the standard system
concept, we will build quantities of certain configurations.
We will begin the
program with some eight systems, and potentially grow this
over the next year to as many as 20 standard systems. At the
same time, we will always continue to provide customers with
the ability to order custom configurations .
Each of our orders now has to
be technically edited. With standard systems, orders will be
preconfigured, resulting in faster order and delivery
turnaround. These systems will be upgradable after they're
installed.
To make standard systems a
workable program at Digital, we need a commitment from each
organization. To put together a catalogue, we're gathering
inputs from the sales force, product managers, the
manufacturing organization and most importantly from the
various marketing groups. We need to decide what products to
include in the program (various VAX configurations are now
being discussed). We're also going to ask the districts and
the subsidiaries to include the standard systems in their
forecasts, and order processing is going to help to make
reliable commitments to our customers. Manufacturing will
make the commitment to build those systems.
The bottom line is that this
program will enable Digital to be much more competitive in
the years ahead.
The availability of a
sophisticated interconnect technology like Ethernet is part
of the reason for the increasing importance of local area
networks. But, fundamentally, computing is rapidly
converging on personal computers and workstations, and local
area networks are important in tying these together.
Stand-alone PCs and
workstations by themselves cannot provide a whole set of
capabilities that historically have been very important in
computing, such as shared data, shared programs, electronic
mail, and sharing of expensive resources such as disks,
printers and tapes. Also, stand-alone PCs and workstations
do not provide large computing capabilities or memory
resources. Local area networks are the solution to these
limitations. In other words, local area networks are in the
mainstream of computing.
These networks can be looked
at as an evolution of the traditional way we build systems.
For a decade we built systems with a common bus structure,
like a UNIBUS, on which we placed a CPU, memory and
controllers for peripherals such as disks, terminals,
printers and communications interfaces. Now we have an
Ethernet which links together a set of servers which provide
disk service, terminal service, printer service and
communications service. This service environment is backed
up by a series of personal computers and workstations which
provide local computing and the human interface.
We do not yet have some of
the little glue pieces that make it all very easy to use.
Those will come in time. But we do have the ability to use
standard VAX and PDP-11 systems as basic print, disk and
compute servers.
With current DECnet software,
we have mail, file access and file transfer capabilities
between the hosts that sit on the Ethernet. Hosts can talk
directly to each other. For any environment which has more
than a couple of hosts, Ethernet offers significantly lower
interconnection costs as compared to the previously
available interconnection technologies.
Our terminal servers can be
used to attach conventional terminals or personal
computers. In this case, Ethernet offers vastly simplified
wiring compared to other approaches. You can put the
terminal server in the vicinity of the terminals and use
only one Ethernet cable rather than a whole waterfall of
different cables. Also, with this method of terminal
attachment, all the hosts are attachable from all the
terminals and all the PCs. You can go directly from any
terminal on the terminal server to any host in the system
without intermediate nodes and intermediate consumption of
computing resources. In addition, terminals attached to
terminal servers perform better, that is, they represent a
lower load on the host than directly attached terminals
would represent.
Digital has the best local
area network hardware and software capabilities in the
industry. Combining these with our wide area network and
cluster capabilities, Digital has the best distributed
system and communication capabilities in the industry.
But a local area network is
not a set of individual components that are thrown in the
customer's lap and left for him or her to figure out how to
use. If we want to win the local area network battle, we are
going to have to engineer, market and sell complete systems
that are complete solutions to real problems. We are putting
together in Engineering a group whose function is to focus
on the local area network as a system. It's very important
that the marketing and sales organizations learn the
capabilities of local area networks and develop the ability
to sell them.
The VAX family of computers
has a huge impact on Digital. We have shipped about 18,000
systems since the first VAX came out in 1977. The family is
used by every market Digital sells to. In FY83 it accounted
for about 60% of the company's total net equipment sales.
The VMS side of this family
is based on a single architecture. All of the hardware
pieces are based on one specification, and we have a single
operating system — VMS. This ensures that all VAX hardware
from MicroVAX up through VAXclusters executes the same
system software. Based on VMS, we build single versions of
each of our layered software products, such as languages and
tools and our information management system. We offer
compatibility from the bottom of our family to the top. To
the user, this means that his or her applications can run on
one member of the family, be transferred to another and
communicate with others without any change. Nobody else in
the industry has it, nor do we believe anybody can get there
from where they are to date.
The first member of the
family was a VAX-11/780 with just VMS, FORTRAN and DECnet.
Our layered products have grown to well over a hundred
products. And as we have added new hardware, we have adhered
to the one family philosophy. As a result, we provide
customers with compatibility, consistency, flexibility and
growth in almost every direction. This means that customers
pay less and their productivity increases.
We are convinced that our
original decision to adhere to a single architecture, our
proprietary VMS operating system and a single version of
each layered products is correct. We confirm this by the
success we have had. However, industry-standard operating
systems, most notably UNIX, have also gained wide
acceptance.
Digital is the leading
supplier of UNIX hardware. Our goal is to retain this
leadership. Today UNIX is available on our PDP-lls and our
VAX systems, and about 5-10% of total VAX system sales are
UNIX-only systems. We believe that percentage will increase.
To directly support UNIX
customers, Digital is developing a set of software and
support products. For VAX, this includes ULTRIX-32 and the
MicroVAX version, ULTRIX-32M. Both of these implement
Berkley's version 4.2 of UNIX. Also, VNX, a set of layered
products based on VMS, provides UNIX-like capabilities in
the VMS environment, giving the user access to clusters,
network, common software, and so forth.
The major target for
ULTRIX-32 is medium- and large-scale computing in technical
markets — such as, computer science research and program
development in universities and labs — where UNIX is
specifically required. VNX layered products are more suited
for commercial applications.
Our selling strategies vary
with the customer. If we’re dealing with a UNIX user and a
UNIX specification, we sell ULTRIX-32. The message is
Digital's strong commitment to UNIX. When the customer
expresses interest in UNIX but is not currently a UNIX user,
VNX is the product we would try to sell. If the customer
does not mention UNIX, we sell our proprietary product —
VMS.
In addition to UNIX we are
watching other industry-standard offerings, such as CP/M[*]
and MS/DOS,[†]
so that, when warranted, they too can be included in the
Digital family. Thus, we continue to push forward with our
proprietary products, fully cognizant of the emerging
industry standards and offering them either on a stand-alone
basis or integrated with other products so that customers
receive maximum benefits for solving their problems.
Ehile Digital's personal computers are
considered to be among the most superbly engineered int he
business, IBM continues to be the cominant force in the personal
computer marketplace. How did IBM establish its lofty position?
And waht must Digital do to maintain a firm positiion in this
marketplace?
When IBM introduced its personal computer in
September 1981, the technical reviewers were unimpressed. It only
had three applications and a couple of games, because it was
targeted for the home market. As it turned out, business people
clamored for it, too, and IBM found itself in the business and
professinal market.
IBM has shipped between 500,000 and 850,000
units, and it's expected that will be up to 2 milion units by the
end of 1984. Today
they hold 50% of the 16-bit busines and professional market. With
their large installed base, they ahve accelerated the spread of
personal computing. Like
it or not, the IBM PC is a force in the computing industry.
Now, personal computing is the most explosive,
fastest growing and most competitive market in the computing
business. It's a
maraket that Digital is committed to because Digital is a
"computing company". Terminals, workstations and personal
computers are the personal interface to all levels of
computing, including minicomputers and mainframes.
Personal computers are our
friends, because they have one important characteristic: they
are computers. People who use them get addicted and want more.
They create more and more data; they get floppy phobia. They
may start with one or two floppies, and then they suddenly
have boxes full. And what do they do with all these floppies?
We've got the answer -- it's called VAX. At the low end, we
have the MicroVAX; and if you really have a lot of PCs, we've
got large VAXs to store your data. Of the 850,000 PCs IBM has
out there, at least 20-30% need to be connected to other
computers. In many cases, they are connected to our VAXs. So
industry-standard personal computers are strategic to Digital.
Considering that IBM is ten
times larger than us, Rainbow, Digital's industry-standard
personal computer, is doing very well. We shipped 60,000 units
in a year — three times as many as we originally forecast.
Today there are over 1,000 third party applications running on
the Rainbow. We have six operating systems on the Rainbow
including CP/M,* UNIX, and MS/DOS**. We believe the Rainbow is
the best buy, far superior to IBM. The quality and the value
that we built into these products are finally beginning to be
understood and acknowledged by the industry.
Unfortunately, many potential
customers still have the misconception that there is a lack of
application software for all three of our personal computers.
We had a study done by Arthur D. Little called "Win the
Fortune 1000 PC War." Out of this study came the following
quote — that Rainbow applications availability is one of the
best kept secrets ever. We have to change this image.
What brings success in the
traditional computer business won't necessarily bring success
in the other business. It's not a matter of one versus the
other — they are simply two different businesses. Our
traditional business is for multi-users; our PC business is
for single users. Traditional computers are powerful,
versatile, and best of all, complex. Personal computers are
easy to use, simple and small. For traditional business, we
reach customers through our direct sales force; for personal
computers, we use retail outlets as well as our own sales
force. From our traditional viewpoint, PCs offload the VAX.
From a PC perspective, the VAX is just a big disk.
Traditional business is
characterized by proprietary operating systems and software.
But industry standards prevail in the personal computer space.
In our traditional business we go after technical and
scientific users who want sophisticated tools and pride
themselves in the ability to read through all the VMS manuals.
End users, on the other hand, want easy-to-use solutions and
refuse to accept a manual. If they can't use the software
without consulting the manual, they will not use the software.
In our traditional business,
VMS and UNIX help move VAXs, and in the personal business
it's applications such as LOTUS that sell personal computers.
In fact, a major part of the personal computer phenomenon is
that there are a lot of people — individuals and small
independent companies — putting a lot of energy in writing
software for them. They've seen fortunes made quickly by
people like themselves, and they have the drive and emotion to
reach for that brass ring.
In the traditional business,
computers sell for $15,000 and more. PCs are in the $2,000 to
$12,000 price range. And the rules for pricing are totally
different. In the traditional business, when we say "entry
price," we mean how much it costs to buy the basic machine you
need to run. But the PC business will sell you a machine that
doesn't do anything for a very low price. Then once they get
your attention, they'll add the "extras" you need, like a
monitor and a keyboard. An equivalent IBM is roughly the same
price as a Rainbow, but you never see that price advertised.
Since we play by Maynard rules and they play by another set of
rules, the customer walking into a store has the impression
that the Rainbow costs $1000 more, which may put it completely
out of consideration. And when customers complain, "Hey, this
IBM actually costs a lot more than I thought. Why didn't you
tell me?" The people in the store say, "Well, the basic
machine costs what was advertised, but there's this whole
wide range of options to choose from. Here, let me show you
what monitors and graphics boards you can choose from." And
they divert the subject to choice, rather than price.
Finally, in our traditional
business, we pride ourselves on superior products with good
enough marketing. But in the PC business, you need good
quality products, but you really need superior marketing.
Now, while the businesses are
different, the technology is the same. So, actually, the PC
business is playing right into Digital's hands. In
multitasking, multi-programming, networking and
communications, can you name a company that can do a better
job than Digital?
Another very important area of
technology is the user interface. There are a lot of us who
believe that the next industry standard will not be around the
number of bits — 8, 16 or 32 — but rather the user interface,
such as windows and the mouse. Psychologically, the mouse is
very important because for the first time you can hold the
whole computer in your hand. In a way, it's like training
wheels on a bicycle. It's very important for the first three
days you use the computer, and after that you turn to the
keyboard. But those are the most important three days.
We believe that we are building
the best industry-standard personal computer for Digital — the
best stand-alone industry-standard PC and the best
industry-standard PC for connecting to Digital equipment. We
also believe that it is a critical component in Digital's
overall architecture for offloading hosts, doing distributed
processing and providing a base engine for the office.
What's at the end of the
Rainbow? If you attach a modem to a Rainbow, the entire world
opens up for you. And our belief is, with Rainbows connected
to VAXs, we have a very strategic product. We have the skills,
the technology, the capability, and the people to be the
number two personal computer supplier to the Fortune 1300.
THIS CONCLUDES THE STATE OF
THE COMPANY REPORT
Nine Named Vice
Presidents
Digital has announced the
appointment of nine senior managers to vice presidential
posts, effective Feb. 15.
John Alexanderson, vice president, Peripherals
and Supplies Group (formerly Installed Base Group), reports to
Jack Shields. John joined Digital in 1969 and has held a
succession of sales and marketing management positions,
including New England Regional sales manager and product group
manager, Accessories and Supplies Group.
Don Busiek, vice president, Software
Services, reports to Jack Shields. Don joined Digital in 1963
and has held various management positions in field service
technical support organizations and product support groups. He
has been Corporate Software Services manager since 1981.
Jerry Butler, vice president, Computer
Special Systems, reports to Jack Shields. He has been with the
company since 1966. As manager, PDP-15 Engineering, Jerry was
responsible for the development of the PDP-15. He has also
held marketing, engineering and general management positions.
He has been CSS product group manager since 1979.
Dave Grainger, vice president,
area manager, Western and Central States Management Center,
reports to Jack Shields. Since joining Digital in 1969, he has
been regional manager, Northern Europe; regional manager,
MidAtlantic States; and U.S. Field Service manager.
Del Lippert, vice president, Educational
Services, reports to Jack Shields. Del came to Digital in 1967
and has held a succession of field service management
positions in Canada and the U.S. He has been Corporate
Educational Services manager for the past 10 years.
Chick Shue, vice president, area
manager, Northeast States Management Center, reports to Jack
Shields. He has been with the company since 1970, and has held
various district and regional sales management positions in
Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and New York.
Peter Smith, vice president, Computer
Aided Engineering and Manufacturing, reports to Ken Olsen. He
joined Digital in 1970, and has served in various marketing
management positions, including product group manager,
Engineering Systems Group.
Harvey Weiss, vice president, area
manager, Mid-Atlantic and Southern States Management Center,
reports to Jack Shields. Since joining Digital in 1971, he has
been marketing manager, Large Computer Group, and product
group manager, Government Systems Group.
Dick Yen, vice president, Far East
Engineering and Manufacturing, reports to Jack Smith. Dick
came to the company in 1972. He has been general manager,
Taiwan, and director, Far East Manufacturing.
Effective April 1, FRANK MCCABE
has been appointed Coporate Manager of Quality, reporting to
Win Hindle, vice president, Corporate Operations. "The pursuit
of quality at Digital is a top-level priority," explains Win.
"To focus attention on both the strategic and operational
importance of quality, we have decided a Corporate Quality
organization is essential." Frank was most recently manager of
Systems Technology in the Systems Manufacturing Group,
working to integrate Engineering and Manufacturing
disciplines to provide top quality products. Before joining
Digital in 1980 as manager of European Volume Manufacturing,
he was managing director of G.E.’s Semiconductor and Consumer
Electronics Business in Ireland.
KEN COPELAND has been named
president of Digital Equipment of Canada Limited. Ken joins
Digital from IBM Canada Ltd., where he held a range of senior
management positions over his 19-year career. "He brings considerable management experience
in operations, sales, marketing and product planning," says
Jerry Witmore, vice president, General International Area.
CHARLENE O'BRIEN, group
personnel manager, Finance and Administration and Office of
the President for the past four years, has been appointed to
the Corporate Personnel Staff, effective March 1. Charlene
will be manager, Senior Management Development, reporting to
John Sims, manager, Corporate Personnel. She will work with
the Personnel Management Committee to design strategies for
executive development. She has been with Digital since 1978.
BARBARA WALKER has joined the
Corporate Personnel staff as manager, Corporate Affirmative
Action and EEO, reporting to John Sims, manager, Corporate
Personnel. Most recently, Barbara was Affirmative Action
manager for Manufacturing/ Engineering. She joined Digital in
1979 as Affirmative Action manager for Manufactur ing.
BOB LEVASSEUR has been named
manager of Corporate Digital Management Education and Office
Automation, reporting to Del Lippert and John Sims. Bob has
held several positions in the Management Sciences organization
since joining Digital in 1974. He was most recently manager of
the group.
When it was first announced on
April 28, 1983, IVIS was a option for the Professional 350
computer, an innovative way to deliver course material, a way
to combine video disk images and sounds with
computer-generated text and graphics. Today IVIS is the
world's most comprehensive training solution. Packaged systems
can include a "touch screen" for situations where the user
might feel intimidated by a keyboard. It comes in stand-alone
and host- connected versions. An authoring system, based on
the VAX/VMS operating system, is available for customers who
want to develop their own courses. Consulting services are
also available to help such customers get started.
Meanwhile Ed Service's Packaged
Courseware Group has announced publication of the first nine
generic IVIS-based courses. And a separate System-Based
Education Group has been formed to bring custom courseware
development closer to the customer, working in the Field,
within the U.S. Area Ed Services organization.
Some IVIS applications and
customers include:
o Retraining: General
Motors — to retrain electricians on the use and maintenance of
programmable controllers, to be used to automate assembly
lines. The first of two courses has been delivered for their
pilot program. Test sites will be set up at six GM locations
in the U.S.
o Factory automation:
General Electric -- to present and record information on the
plant floor where skilled workers assemble jet engines. In
this case, IVIS displays procedures for disassembly, assembly,
inspection, and quality control, shows bill of materials
information and links into a larger computer network for
tracking material flow, etc. The first system is in pilot
evaluation in Lynn, Mass.
o College education:
Grove City College, Penna. — for teaching a variety of college
subjects. They plan to have one IVIS system for every four or
five of their 2500 students. Faculty members are going through
training at Ed Services in Bedford, Mass., to enable them to
develop their own course-ware.
o Business and
industrial training: ANCO (Ireland) — to develop courses
for use by its 15,000 member companies. Subjects will include
technical skills such as welding, robotics, pneumatics and
hydraulics as well as business topics such as finance for the
non-finaneial manager. This is a joint venture between Anco
and Digital that will give Digital world-wide marketing rights
to the courseware developed.
o Public education:
Lexington and Lynnfield, Mass., Public Schools -- received a
federal grant to have eight of their teachers trained at
Digital in IVIS course development and to develop a program on
physical sciences to be used in middle schools.
o Teaching the military:
University of Maryland -- under contract to the U.S.
government developed IVIS-based courses in literacy and in
diagnostic maintenance skills. These are now on trial with the
Seventh Army in West Germany.
o Retail marketing: ADP
— to develop interactive video programs for automotive
dealers to show potential customers all available models,
colors and options and to calculate the costs of various
financing choices.